Socrates Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1

Socrates - screen Examplelistening to both sides of the blood line rejects the study of linguistic process altogether declaring it sh exclusivelyow and shoddier than the study of things themselves. If we go into the details of this argument, Platos seems to argue that nothing significant can be known about a particular thing by examining its name Keller(2000,pp. 285-305) . The actual worth of a thing lies in itself which seems convince to some extent. However, at the same time, it seems a bit irrational to assume that the words or names have an intrinsic relation to the things they signify .A same thing can be viewed differently by different individuals depending on his mind set. It certainly will not be wrong to say that it is all a matter of perception. For instance, the word ugly sounds ugly but it certainly does not signify the marrow squash of the thing it is referring to and it sounds ugly only because it has been inculcated in our minds from the beginning of our lives th ereby making Hermogenes argument stronger Robinson(1956,pp. 325). Even the educational psychology reveals that it is not the verbal utterances but the behavioral patterns that have a deep impact on a persons mind. Socrates argument, on one hand, sounds convincing but on the other hand, the brilliance of language cannot be denied altogether and I firmly believe that the two of them go hand in hand. It is indeed more important to go into the depth of the thing itself in order to study it extensively, however, language is an essential medium to give ones thoughts a voice with interesting corollary which basically is the about significant attribute of mankind and giving them equal importance sounds a lot better than the Socrates argument of rejecting the language altogether. Hence, it can be said that the name of a thing may not be as important as the thing itself but a thing without any apparent identity of its own makes it hard to describe. In fact, the plot of the argument shows a contrast between what Socrates is defending in